Request a
call back
In a landmark decision the High Court has given trustees expanded Trustee Powers under Section 57(1) of the Trustee Act 1925. This ruling allows trustees to manage assets in more tax efficient ways a crucial development for those involved in IHT tax planning. Explore the details of this case & its potential impact on future trust management.
What is Section 57(1) of the Trustee Act 1925?
The High Court has expanded the Power of Trustees for Inheritance Tax Planning under expediency provisions illustrated in Section 57 (1) of the Trustee ACT 1925. It is the first time that the court has passed an order where it had granted additional powers to the trustees.
The court is allowed to step in where it adjudges that trustees would be convenient to deal with assets in a certain way, but a trust deed bars them from doing so due to the absence of specific powers. In such cases, the court will step in to grant these additional powers to the trustees.
The High Court’s Ruling: Expanding Trustee Powers
The EWHC (England and Wales High Court) was approached by the trustees of the Allendale 1949 Settlement, while Lord Allendale and his son, as beneficiaries, were defendants in the case.
The purpose of the application was to secure powers necessary for moving assets more conveniently within the family’s sub-trusts. The applicants also requested additional powers to enhance the administration and management of the trust’s property. The trust, formed in the 1940s, lacked provisions commonly included in modern trusts.
There was disagreement over the scope of these “additional powers,” with one party arguing that the court could only exercise authority for specific transactions, while the other claimed Section 57 had broader applicability.
Implications for Inheritance Tax Planning
The trustees argued that additional powers were crucial for restructuring assets in a more tax-efficient way. They also sought the flexibility to move assets easily within funds.
The settlement comprises four sub-funds. Viscount Allendale held a life interest in the W-Fund, while his son had a life interest in the I-Fund and another fund.
The defendants sought to transfer assets from the W-Fund to the I-Fund in exchange for assets of equal value. However, they were barred from doing so due to the lack of authority.
When the court was asked to grant additional powers for such transactions, the trustees actually requested eight additional powers unrelated to the specific transaction at hand. After careful deliberation, the EWHC concluded it was in the trustees’ legal interests to move assets between the funds and granted them the necessary powers.
Read Also:
Case Study: Allendale 1949 Settlement
The court linked the self-dealing power to the appointment of an independent trustee, who has no personal interest in the transaction. It dismissed the request for a general power to delegate, as the trustees were unable to convince the court that such power was necessary.
Other additional powers granted by the court under Section 57(1) included the power to establish entities, the power to give assets to minors, the power to elect investment advisors, and the power to pay corporate trustees despite there being no such trustees. Analysts found the decision unsurprising, considering the trust deed was over 70 years old, but it could set a precedent for trustees managing older deeds.
Conclusion: A Precedent for Modern Trustees?
This ruling could set a powerful precedent for trustees managing older trusts. If you’re seeking expert guidance on how these changes impact your inheritance tax planning, contact us at IBISS & CO for personalised advice.
